| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun |
| Date: | 2013-10-22 17:45:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTo53wN5up1kv7Sa=DQC2yCBz1=8+x4LGkArte_EGgrdA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> I may be missing something, but there are already plenty of b-tree specific
> flags. See BTP_* in nbtree.h. I'll just add another to that list.
Based on your remarks, I thought that you were intent on directly
using page level bits (pd_flags), rather than the private state flag
bits. Blame it on the lack of coffee, I suppose.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-10-22 17:56:52 | Re: Reasons not to like asprintf |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-10-22 17:30:35 | Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun |