From: | Smolkin Grigory <smallkeen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brian Cosgrove <cosgroveb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bradford Boyle <bradford(dot)d(dot)boyle(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Packages for pg_doorman |
Date: | 2025-03-16 13:23:26 |
Message-ID: | CAMp+ueZONqwTHtN7SWo2GTv1Vbpu6agqpgTbBRQ-o4wmWcrbwQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
> For such a new piece of infrastructure is there really a compelling
reason to support distributions older than Debian bookworm (released 3
years ago)? Do you have any current use-cases for something older?
>
Well, only for the sake of user-friendliness to the people on really old
distributions, if it will not come at the price of real pain in our
backsides. We ourselves use only ubuntu:22.04 for now.
And I'm sure that vendoring will be of great help here.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Smolkin Grigory | 2025-03-19 05:39:31 | Re: Packages for pg_doorman |
Previous Message | Brian Cosgrove | 2025-03-16 11:30:29 | Re: Packages for pg_doorman |