| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared |
| Date: | 2018-06-07 10:40:48 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jL1O--E7B25j_Loy+bjJhAFpZAc4Trp1ZouadW8w5ngqQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | 503 스포츠 토토 베트맨 |
On 7 June 2018 at 11:29, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Do we actually need the completion tag at all? In most cases??
>
>
> affected rows is taken from this value on protocol level
I didn't mean we should remove the number of rows. Many things rely on that.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-06-07 10:42:58 | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled. |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-06-07 10:29:09 | Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared |