| From: | Takashi Menjo <takashi(dot)menjo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Takashi Menjo <takashi(dot)menjou(dot)vg(at)hco(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Deng, Gang" <gang(dot)deng(at)intel(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer |
| Date: | 2021-03-01 01:30:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAOwnP3OHhMtJdga4GULi+2nFrS8cD0UPPgLdnbKBZiDqRdZqPw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Sawada,
I am relieved to hear that the performance problem was solved.
And I added a tip about PMEM namespace and partitioning in PG wiki[1].
Regards,
[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Persistent_Memory_for_WAL#Configure_and_verify_DAX_hugepage_faults
--
Takashi Menjo <takashi(dot)menjo(at)gmail(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ajin Cherian | 2021-03-01 01:53:17 | Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-03-01 01:29:14 | Re: Optimising latch signals |