| From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Townsend <jtownsend(at)advancedformulas(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Procedural Languages |
| Date: | 2012-05-31 17:20:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAOzAqu+BV64vO9ywA8D7f6rOMjaN1fuSWMT2raT3fMhR=x7=ew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:36 AM, John Townsend <
jtownsend(at)advancedformulas(dot)com> wrote:
> There are least 10 Procedural Languages<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL/pgSQL>available for PostGreSQL. The one that comes with the installation is
> PL/pgSQL.
>
> Which ones do you use and why?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Townsend
>
PL/pgSQL and PL/perlu are the only ones I use. I use PL/perlu primarily to
launch shell scripts from triggers, for example to update an external
website when a row in a table has been inserted, deleted or updated.
--
Mike Nolan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Salisbury | 2012-05-31 17:52:22 | Re: Procedural Languages |
| Previous Message | Leif Biberg Kristensen | 2012-05-31 16:03:31 | Re: Procedural Languages |