Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jonathan Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Date: 2020-04-08 12:59:50
Message-ID: CAPpHfdt78x-aOhbTdY01HJ-ydM9ZSo-sRJNi0pwk7WmWd0xxAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Realistically it still 2-3 hours of proof-reading.
>
> This makes me sad :(

Can we ask RMT to extend feature freeze for this particular patchset?
I think it's reasonable assuming extreme importance of this patchset.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-04-08 13:24:13 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Previous Message David Steele 2020-04-08 12:58:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" test pending solution of its timing is (fwd)