| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: config files in /data |
| Date: | 2000-06-02 00:37:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0006020235520.372-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> The distinction between /global and /internal is a little bit artificial
> (which one does pg_log belong in? It's only sort of a table...),
Is there any reason these special tables are catalogued? Also, with the
catalog version number, is there any more use for the PG_VERSION file?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-06-02 00:37:12 | Re: AW: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-01 23:53:09 | Re: Problems with recent CVS versions and Solaris. |