| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Stand ards |
| Date: | 2001-06-07 14:34:33 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106071628100.757-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
> Actually I am not sure whether the column = NULL syntax is even defined
> or allowed in SQL92
I think you're right.
> (e.g. Informix interprets the NULL as column name in this context and
> errs out).
NULL is a reserved word, so this would be wrong.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Forsman | 2001-06-07 14:37:36 | Re: Re: Daily Digest V1 #1428 |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-06-07 14:23:51 | grant and SQL92 |