| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Licensing issues including another projects source |
| Date: | 2001-11-05 20:04:46 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111051714510.617-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Cramer writes:
> I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with
> this clause?
It would require everyone that ships a product based on the JDBC driver to
mention this acknowledgement in advertisements, which is annoying and
impractical. More generally, it would introduce a divergence in licensing
in PostgreSQL, which should be avoided.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-05 20:05:03 | Re: compiler warnings in ODBC |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-11-05 20:00:39 | Re: compiler warnings in ODBC |