| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Date: | 2002-09-25 16:55:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0209251055110.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I don't see the gain of having a file called pg_xlog vs. using GUC.
>
> Well, the point is to have a safety interlock --- but I like Jan's
> idea of using matching identification files in both directories.
> With that, a GUC variable seems just fine.
Agreed, the interlock is a great idea. I hadn't seen that one go by.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-09-25 17:07:19 | Re: making use of large TLB pages |
| Previous Message | 韩近强 | 2002-09-25 16:55:18 | inquiry |