| From: | Gregor Zeitlinger <zeitling(at)informatik(dot)hu-berlin(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Date: | 2003-10-23 11:06:03 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310231304480.28617-100000@mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-chat pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> 4. Extend the contrib/ltree gist-based tree indexing scheme to work on
> xml and hence the operations in no.3 above are really fast...
but then, the plain xml data is still stored in a database colum, if I
understand correctly?
--
Gregor Zeitlinger
gregor(at)zeitlinger(dot)de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-23 11:40:33 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-23 11:03:17 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-23 11:19:10 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-23 11:03:17 | Re: is GiST still alive? |