| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Date: | 2002-08-05 19:40:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208052139440.927-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway writes:
> I'd rather be spec compliant. That way nobody has a good basis for
> complaining ;-)
How long until someone figures out that to be spec-compliant you need
NAMEDATALEN 129? ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-05 21:31:03 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-08-05 19:22:23 | Re: Build errors with current CVS |