| From: | Reinhard Max <max(at)suse(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mahlon Stacy <mcs(at)mayo(dot)edu>, "'pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgtcl large object fix |
| Date: | 2003-08-07 10:10:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0308071203480.31993-100000@wotan.suse.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 at 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mahlon Stacy <mcs(at)mayo(dot)edu> writes:
> > Newer versions of TCL implement ByteArray objects which are
> > the best fit for Postgresql Large Object functions.
>
> How newer is "newer"? That is, what compatibility problems might we
> create if we make this change?
ByteArrays were introduced in Tcl 8.1 (March 1999) along with the
change to use utf-8 as internal string encoding.
cu
Reinhard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christian van der Leeden | 2003-08-07 11:01:29 | Follow up: range query with timestamp returns different result with index than without (7.3.3) |
| Previous Message | Christian van der Leeden | 2003-08-07 06:52:12 | range query with timestamp returns different result with index than without (7.3.3) |