| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> |
| Cc: | carstenklein(at)yahoo(dot)de, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Embedded SQL: Putting a guard around included |
| Date: | 2003-10-08 18:23:29 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310082022460.26413-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Peter Galbavy writes:
> Does POSIX say anything about multiple inclusion of this and others ?
"Except that the effect of each inclusion of <assert.h> depends on the
definition of NDEBUG, headers may be included in any order, and each may
be included more than once in a given scope, with no difference in effect
from that of being included only once."
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Shevchenko | 2003-10-11 09:20:25 | libpq/async notifications |
| Previous Message | Peter Galbavy | 2003-10-08 10:27:04 | Re: Embedded SQL: Putting a guard around included stdio.h for convenience |