From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] refactor ATExec{En,Dis}ableRowSecurity |
Date: | 2021-03-02 03:34:17 |
Message-ID: | YD2yOYCRhnUjp6kA@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:30:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 0001 is a clean simplification and a good catch, so I'll see about
> applying it. 0002 just makes the code more confusing to the reader
> IMO, and its interface could easily lead to unwanted errors.
0001 has been applied as of fabde52.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | walker | 2021-03-02 03:35:42 | psql crash while executing core regression tests |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-03-02 03:25:29 | Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages |