| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age() |
| Date: | 2024-11-19 01:09:57 |
| Message-ID: | ZzvlZU_2OpjIaRye@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 08:11:57AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Also it looks like that for PG 16, 7471230cc6, did put the functions description
> in the "Control Data Functions". That looks unintentional too, so moving it to
> "Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Functions" section instead.
>
> Please find attached the 3 patches.
Even with the monitoring query argument left aside, I agree that there
are more upsides to not list them as deprecated for now, based on the
reason that xid is still a data type in some catalogs, like pg_class's
relfrozenxid and relminmxid. Note as well that we've used them in
vacuumdb.
In short, your suggestion makes sense to me. Any thoughts or comments
from others?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-11-19 01:13:02 | Re: Document for wal_log_hints |
| Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2024-11-19 01:03:57 | Document for wal_log_hints |