| From: | iseki <admin(at)iseki(dot)space> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section |
| Date: | 2024-10-11 13:00:25 |
| Message-ID: | a767cf97-1743-4dd7-add2-4eb0587efb25@iseki.space |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oh sorry, I should use [reply to all] instead of [reply]. I don't have
much experience with mailing lists...
But why the mailing list haven't use the "Reply-To" header specify where
to reply? Because the mail is you send to me directly?
Thank you.
On 2024/10/11 14:53, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 11:04 +0800, admin(at)iseki(dot)space wrote:
>> Maybe add the whole example or the URL to the document is better?
> You shouldn't address that reply to me personally...
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Durgamahesh Manne | 2024-10-11 13:31:50 | Fwd: Inefficient use of index scan on 2nd column of composite index during concurrent activity |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-10-11 12:48:19 | Re: Question on indexes |