| From: | "marcin mank" <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
| Date: | 2008-12-26 00:42:29 |
| Message-ID: | b1b9fac60812251642g2b2c9940h9997e0e53ad3fa16@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토SQL : Postg토토SQL |
> Perhaps we should listen to the people that have said they don't want
> queries cancelled, even if the alternative is inconsistent answers.
I think an alternative to that would be "if the wal backlog is too
big, let current queries finish and let incoming queries wait till the
backlog gets smaller".
fell free to ignore me, as a non-hacker I`m not even supposed to be
reading this list :-]
Greetings
Marcin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2008-12-26 00:46:20 | Re: [idea] a copied relkind in pg_attribute |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-12-25 18:43:56 | Re: [idea] a copied relkind in pg_attribute |