| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assert failure with ICU support |
| Date: | 2023-04-20 19:47:21 |
| Message-ID: | c480b495be592d600504b99e70745ed8f43c877b.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 16:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> + if (c >= 0x100 || !iscalnum(c))
I'm curious why you say >= 0x100 rather than >= 0x80?
What's the purpose of the error? Is it to catch mistakes, or is it to
reserve room for adding new escape sequences in the future?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-20 19:53:01 | Re: Assert failure with ICU support |
| Previous Message | Junwang Zhao | 2023-04-20 11:17:02 | Re: BUG #17903: There is a bug in the KeepLogSeg() |