| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)pgsql-performance"(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | linux and anotime mount option |
| Date: | 2004-03-31 23:26:53 |
| Message-ID: | c4fk3v$ml6c4fk3v$ml6$1@floppy.pyrenet.fr@floppy.pyrenet.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Do you know if postgres made assumption on the
access time time stamp for the files on his
own file sistem ? If not I'm wondering if
mount a partition with the option "anotime"
can improve the disk i/o performance.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-04-01 00:07:48 | Re: The incompaitiblity of libpq and non-GCC compilers |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-03-31 22:29:57 | Re: LIKE and Locale |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-04-01 01:19:07 | Re: What index for 'like (%keyword%)' ??? |
| Previous Message | Paul Thomas | 2004-03-31 17:27:01 | Re: select slow? |