| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jacktby <jacktby(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to build a new grammer for pg? |
| Date: | 2023-08-01 16:50:40 |
| Message-ID: | e2f8361a202f0a15c7ad9c52025eb67e@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-08-01 07:58, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:36:36PM +0800, jacktby wrote:
>> Hi, I’m trying to develop a new grammar for pg
>
> It's unclear to me whether you want to entirely replace the flex/bison
> parser
> with something else or just add some new bison rule.
Or express a grammar matching PG's in some other parser-generator
language, to enable some other tool to parse PG productions?
Regards,
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2023-08-01 17:02:12 | Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-08-01 16:37:07 | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? |