| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
|---|
| From: | "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ? |
| Date: | 2001-03-27 10:32:43 |
| Message-ID: | 000b01c0b6a9387b6001a8c0@knowledge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
I have built and run "gmake check" on OpenBSD 2.8-stable (i386) and all
appears well. I tried a cursury glance through the docs to see if there was
a suitable place and instructions for regression tests, but I found none.
Anyone want them ?
I would like to see OpenBSD in the supported platforms list.
--
Peter Galbavy
Knowledge Matters Ltd.
http://www.knowledge.com/
| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ? |
| Date: | 2001-03-27 14:52:43 |
| Message-ID: | 3AC0A93B.3C001A73@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
> I have built and run "gmake check" on OpenBSD 2.8-stable (i386) and all
> appears well. I tried a cursury glance through the docs to see if there was
> a suitable place and instructions for regression tests, but I found none.
> Anyone want them ?
Yes!
> I would like to see OpenBSD in the supported platforms list.
It is there for the upcoming release, as of a few days ago. But
confirmation that it works for more than one tester is very important,
so thanks for the report.
- Thomas
| From: | "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ? |
| Date: | 2001-03-27 15:09:47 |
| Message-ID: | 004201c0b6d0e6fb72001a8c0@knowledge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
> It is there for the upcoming release, as of a few days ago. But
> confirmation that it works for more than one tester is very important,
> so thanks for the report.
You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
the "gmake check" to complete.
I may be able to test OpenBSD/sparc but only after the 7.1 release - what I
mean is more than a few weeks.
Peter
| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
| Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ? |
| Date: | 2001-03-27 15:39:53 |
| Message-ID: | 3AC0B449.A342B608@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
> You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
> default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
> the "gmake check" to complete.
That is in the "tuning" category, so I won't bother mentioning it in the
one liner summary.
> I may be able to test OpenBSD/sparc but only after the 7.1 release - what I
> mean is more than a few weeks.
Great! Do you happen to know anyone who could test earlier? Just asking;
at this time of the release cycle I get unreasonably focused on getting
our "platform scorecard" higher ;)
- Thomas
| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ? |
| Date: | 2001-03-27 16:43:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0103271843070.1215-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Peter Galbavy writes:
> You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
> default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
> the "gmake check" to complete.
There is some documentation about this here
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/kernel-resources.html#AEN12974
but I can see how this could be hard to find offhand.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/