Lists: | Postg스포츠 토토 베트맨SQL : Postg스포츠 토토 베트맨SQL 메일 링리스트 : 2002-05-23 이후 PGSQL-BUGS 22:41 |
---|
From: | "Michael Beckstette" <mbeckste(at)TechFak(dot)Uni-Bielefeld(dot)DE> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | length limitation in '=' operator when comparing TEXT fields ? |
Date: | 2002-05-23 19:23:55 |
Message-ID: | 1020523212355.ZM10386@sirari.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
i have a little problem when selecting entries from a table, specified by a
long match on a field of type TEXT. Is there a length limitation for the '='
operator when comparing a field of type TEXT to a given string ?
Example:
SELECT description FROM sequences_33 WHERE description LIKE 'gi 17559974%';
Result:
gi 17559974 ref NP_506864.1 (NM_074463) acid phosphatase [Caenorhabditis
elega
ns] gi 7499536 pir T21181 hypothetical protein F21A3.2 - Caenorhabditis
elegans
gi 3876155 emb CAB04153.1 (Z81509) predicted using Genefinder Similarity to
As
pergillus acid phosphatase (TR:Q12546) cDNA EST yk3g4.5 comes from this gene
cDN
A EST yk69f10.5 comes from this gene cDNA EST yk231b3.5 comes from this gene
cDN
A EST yk285e4.5 comes from this gene cDN
(1 row)
Thats ok. And now:
SELECT description FROM sequences_33 WHERE description=' gi 17559974 ref
NP_506864.1 (NM_074463) acid phosphatase [Caenorhabditis elega
ns] gi 7499536 pir T21181 hypothetical protein F21A3.2 - Caenorhabditis
elegans
gi 3876155 emb CAB04153.1 (Z81509) predicted using Genefinder Similarity to
As
pergillus acid phosphatase (TR:Q12546) cDNA EST yk3g4.5 comes from this gene
cDN
A EST yk69f10.5 comes from this gene cDNA EST yk231b3.5 comes from this gene
cDN
A EST yk285e4.5 comes from this gene cDN'
(0 row)
The two strings are identical and there are no confusing characters in them.
Any idea ?
PS: The type of field description is TEXT
Thanx in advance
Michael
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Beckstette Office: M3-129
AG-PI / Technische Fakultaet EMail:mbeckste(at)techfak(dot)uni-bielefeld(dot)de
Universitaet Bielefeld Fon: +49-521-106-2914
Postfach 100131 Fax: +49-521-106-6411
D-33501 BIELEFELD
Germany
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Beckstette" <mbeckste(at)TechFak(dot)Uni-Bielefeld(dot)DE> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: length limitation in '=' operator when comparing TEXT fields ? |
Date: | 2002-05-23 20:15:23 |
Message-ID: | 23370.1022184923@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Michael Beckstette" <mbeckste(at)TechFak(dot)Uni-Bielefeld(dot)DE> writes:
> i have a little problem when selecting entries from a table, specified by a
> long match on a field of type TEXT. Is there a length limitation for the '='
> operator when comparing a field of type TEXT to a given string ?
No.
> Example:
> SELECT description FROM sequences_33 WHERE description LIKE 'gi 17559974%';
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> [ finds a row ]
> SELECT description FROM sequences_33 WHERE description=' gi 17559974 ref
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> [ finds no row ]
You seem to think that leading spaces are insignificant. They are not.
regards, tom lane
From: | "Michael Beckstette" <mbeckste(at)TechFak(dot)Uni-Bielefeld(dot)DE> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: length limitation in '=' operator when comparing TEXT fields ? |
Date: | 2002-05-23 22:41:44 |
Message-ID: | 1020524004144.ZM10686@sirari.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | Postg스포츠 토토 베트맨SQL : Postg스포츠 토토 베트맨SQL 메일 링리스트 : 2002-05-23 이후 PGSQL-BUGS 22:41 |
Hi,
ok my fault. It was a cut and paste error, there is no leading blank. In my
view this only happens when the strings to compare are quite "long".
If there is no limitation for the '=' operator itself,could it be possible that
something like this happens when the query is passed through LIPQ's PQexec
function ?
My system:
PostgreSQL 7.1.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1, compiled by GCC 2.95
Regards
Michael Beckstette