| Lists: | pgsql-cluster-hackers |
|---|
| From: | "Gurgel, Flavio" <flavio(at)4linux(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Koichi Suzuki <koichi(at)intellilink(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgresCluster ML <pgsql-cluster-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BOF at pgCon? |
| Date: | 2010-06-10 16:44:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1558242842.14424.1276188282780.JavaMail.root@mail.4linux.com.br |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-cluster-hackers |
----- Mensagem original -----
> Many clustering people gathered and we had very good time. I talked
> about XC thing with several other guys there but I don't know what was
> going on in total.
I can help here a bit.
There were a lot of people interested in clustering, but since there are many different solutions for different tasks the BOF turned into 3 or 4 groups discussing each technology.
I remember people interested in Slony, pgpool, PostgresXC (including me), londiste, pgbouncer and plproxy.
The discussion about XC was interesting. Fellows from NTT and EnterpriseDB are open to discuss how it will improve and how design changes and decisions can make a better software.
I think the BOF started as a great way to keep in touch with interesting people and try to find ways to help those projects.
Flavio Henrique A. Gurgel
tel. 55-11-2125.4786
cel. 55-11-8389.7635
www.4linux.com.br
FREE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS
| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-cluster-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BOF at pgCon? |
| Date: | 2010-06-10 17:01:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4C111A51.7030903@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | Postg토토 결과SQL : Postg토토 |
Greg,
As you've already read, the BOF turned into more of a social thing. The
closing session ran over, and by the time we started the BOF we had to
move to the pub or we'd have lost most of the attendees to hunger.
As it was, we had about 25 people in one wing of the pub. Several
clustering users introduced themselves and why they were interested in
clustering. Tellingly, even in this small sample (around 12 users) we
had a full range of reasons to cluster: failover, continuous HA, read
scalability, write scalability, burst traffic tolerance.
Then the various clustering projects present (Slony, PostgresXC, Skype,
pgPool2) introduced themselves. At that point, we divided into groups
discussing different clustering technologies.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com