Re: last note to rewrite function

Lists: Postg젠 토토SQL :
From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: last note to rewrite function
Date: 2007-11-09 21:13:30
Message-ID: 162867790711091313l6b5056f6rf42e2d9bde548f5f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

ts_rewrite(ARRAY[query TSQUERY, target TSQUERY, sample TSQUERY])
returns TSQUERY

why we use array? Multicolumn aggregate function is maybe more natural?

and we can this? It is too late for change?

Regards
Pavel Stehule


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: last note to rewrite function
Date: 2007-11-09 22:16:32
Message-ID: 29461.1194646592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ts_rewrite(ARRAY[query TSQUERY, target TSQUERY, sample TSQUERY])
> returns TSQUERY

> why we use array?

That function is gone.

regards, tom lane


From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: last note to rewrite function
Date: 2007-11-10 00:00:38
Message-ID: 162867790711091600q7e81c2ar8af15459d0e87024@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: Postg젠 토토SQL :

On 09/11/2007, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > ts_rewrite(ARRAY[query TSQUERY, target TSQUERY, sample TSQUERY])
> > returns TSQUERY
>
> > why we use array?
>
> That function is gone.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
ook, sure

Pavel