| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| Date: | 2000-09-01 13:28:05 |
| Message-ID: | 16289.967814885@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> then it becomes
> SELECT * FROM (SELECT a, b, c FROM my_table);
> which would presumably be possible with the new query-tree.
Right, that's exactly how we've been planning to fix the problems
with grouped views and so forth.
I am beginning to think that this may have to happen for 7.1, else
view inside ISO-style JOIN constructs aren't going to work right.
Further news as it happens...
regards, tom lane
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| Date: | 2000-09-01 22:02:45 |
| Message-ID: | 29314.967845765@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I suggest let's get what we have out of the door now and
> don't work under pressure on these complex things.
Pressure? I've got a month, I thought. Should be plenty of time.
regards, tom lane
| From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| Date: | 2000-09-01 22:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200009012221.RAA19767@jupiter.jw.home |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > then it becomes
> > SELECT * FROM (SELECT a, b, c FROM my_table);
> > which would presumably be possible with the new query-tree.
>
> Right, that's exactly how we've been planning to fix the problems
> with grouped views and so forth.
>
> I am beginning to think that this may have to happen for 7.1, else
> view inside ISO-style JOIN constructs aren't going to work right.
> Further news as it happens...
You really want to start on that NOW?
I suggest let's get what we have out of the door now and
don't work under pressure on these complex things.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #