Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
---|
From: | "Jan Mate" <mate(at)yeea(dot)eu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | BUG #3937: timestamp null value comparison in subquery using IN/NOT IN |
Date: | 2008-02-06 20:15:59 |
Message-ID: | 200802062015.m16KFxQo017080@wwwmaster.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3937
Logged by: Jan Mate
Email address: mate(at)yeea(dot)eu
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.6
Operating system: Linux & Mac OS X
Description: timestamp null value comparison in subquery using IN/NOT
IN
Details:
Comparison between null and timestamp null value is not correct.
Try this example:
CREATE TABLE _test ("timestamp" timestamp);
INSERT INTO _test (timestamp) VALUES (null);
SELECT 1 WHERE (null) NOT IN (SELECT * FROM _test);
?column?
----------
(0 rows)
SELECT 1 WHERE (null) IN (SELECT * FROM _test);
?column?
----------
(0 rows)
Is there any other way to compare the subquery result (using IN or NOT IN)
with null value?
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jan Mate" <mate(at)yeea(dot)eu> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #3937: timestamp null value comparison in subquery using IN/NOT IN |
Date: | 2008-02-06 23:28:59 |
Message-ID: | 19919.1202340539@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | Postg토토 베이SQL : Postg토토 베이SQL 메일 링리스트 : 2008-02-06 이후 PGSQL-BUGS 23:28 |
"Jan Mate" <mate(at)yeea(dot)eu> writes:
> Comparison between null and timestamp null value is not correct.
No, it's your expectations that are not correct. Null is not "equal to"
null --- in fact both the queries you show will evaluate the WHERE
clause as null (unknown).
> Is there any other way to compare the subquery result (using IN or NOT IN)
> with null value?
Don't try to use null as a normal data value. Sooner or later you'll
always regret it.
regards, tom lane