Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
---|
From: | cgripeos(at)hotmail(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | BUG #13634: postgresql-9.4.4-3-x64 server firing empty messages on console |
Date: | 2015-09-23 17:57:33 |
Message-ID: | 20150923175733.5073.91684@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 13634
Logged by: Chris
Email address: cgripeos(at)hotmail(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 9.4.4
Operating system: Windows 7 x64
Description:
Hello,
I am new to postgresql and not a Linux/Unix user.
I apologize if this is not the right place to post this, but it does look
like a bug (but again I am new to postgresql).
I just installed postgresql-9.4.4-3-x64 on a Windows 7 x64 PC.
After the installation, I verified that an automatic startup service was
added to the Windows Services as follows:
Path to executable:
"C:\Users\xxx\PostgreSQL\9.4\bin\pg_ctl.exe" runservice -N
"postgresql-x64-9.4" -D "C:\Users\xxx\PostgreSQL\9.4\data" -w"
Log on as: "Local System account" & "Allow service to interact with
desktop"
The problem I am experiencing is that (after about a minute the portgresql
server service starts) I get a message from "Interactive Services Detection"
saying that "A program running on this computer is trying to display a
message". When I click on "View the Message", I am shown a blank command
console with nothing in it.
I know that the server is running, because I can log in.
Closing the console kills the postgresql server. Ignoring the message, just
makes it come back a minute later.
What could this mean?
Am I doing something wrong or is this a problem with the Windows version of
postgresql 9.4 (or even the installer)?
Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you in advance,
Chris
From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | cgripeos(at)hotmail(dot)com |
Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13634: postgresql-9.4.4-3-x64 server firing empty messages on console |
Date: | 2015-09-23 18:17:43 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbRnHZcQf7Bd2z3Pkqjj2eP+SUz8uJS4bxmr0cktTuTSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, <cgripeos(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 13634
> Logged by: Chris
> Email address: cgripeos(at)hotmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.4.4
> Operating system: Windows 7 x64
> Description:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am new to postgresql and not a Linux/Unix user.
>
> I apologize if this is not the right place to post this, but it does look
> like a bug (but again I am new to postgresql).
>
>
> I just installed postgresql-9.4.4-3-x64 on a Windows 7 x64 PC.
>
> After the installation, I verified that an automatic startup service was
> added to the Windows Services as follows:
>
> Path to executable:
> "C:\Users\xxx\PostgreSQL\9.4\bin\pg_ctl.exe" runservice -N
> "postgresql-x64-9.4" -D "C:\Users\xxx\PostgreSQL\9.4\data" -w"
>
> Log on as: "Local System account" & "Allow service to interact with
> desktop"
>
>
> The problem I am experiencing is that (after about a minute the portgresql
> server service starts) I get a message from "Interactive Services
> Detection"
> saying that "A program running on this computer is trying to display a
> message". When I click on "View the Message", I am shown a blank command
> console with nothing in it.
>
> I know that the server is running, because I can log in.
>
> Closing the console kills the postgresql server. Ignoring the message, just
> makes it come back a minute later.
>
> What could this mean?
>
> Am I doing something wrong or is this a problem with the Windows version of
> postgresql 9.4 (or even the installer)?
>
> Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated!
>
I would say this is probably a bug, as described, but why "Allow service
to interact with desktop" in the first place?
David J.