Re: Just checking on a few bugs...

I never saw them. Strange.

> I've sent two bugs to this list in the past few days from
> one of my other accounts, and just got around to signing up for
> the list myself--I wanted to see if they actually got here and
> were addressed.
>
> The first involved SELECT/IN returning rows with empty fields
> in ODBC
>
> The second involved pg_dump crashing while trying to dump the
> indices of databases with indexed oid fields.
>
> Anyone see those two come by? The mailing list archive seems
> to be missing a few days in there.
>
> --
> Adam Haberlach |"You have to understand that the
> adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com | entire 'Net is based on people with
> http://www.newsnipple.com/ | too much free time on their hands."
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

I've sent two bugs to this list in the past few days from
one of my other accounts, and just got around to signing up for
the list myself--I wanted to see if they actually got here and
were addressed.

The first involved SELECT/IN returning rows with empty fields
in ODBC

The second involved pg_dump crashing while trying to dump the
indices of databases with indexed oid fields.

Anyone see those two come by? The mailing list archive seems
to be missing a few days in there.

--
Adam Haberlach |"You have to understand that the
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com | entire 'Net is based on people with
http://www.newsnipple.com/ | too much free time on their hands."

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I never saw them. Strange.

Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping
traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that
were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come
through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end...

regards, tom lane

On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I never saw them. Strange.
>
> Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping
> traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that
> were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come
> through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end...

Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the
reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as
has been configured for *ages* now ...

Ed Loehr(sp?) just reported a similar problem with pgsql-general, and from
everything I can tell from looking at the pre-Majordomo2 lists, he was
never subscribed there or now ... this time, its not Majordomo2's fault
...

Adam, did you get any message back, though, on those patches? It *should*
send you something back to say it wasn't posted ... if not, then that
would be Majordomo2 not doing it ...

> On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > I never saw them. Strange.
> >
> > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping
> > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that
> > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come
> > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end...
>
> Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the
> reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as
> has been configured for *ages* now ...
>
> Ed Loehr(sp?) just reported a similar problem with pgsql-general, and from
> everything I can tell from looking at the pre-Majordomo2 lists, he was
> never subscribed there or now ... this time, its not Majordomo2's fault
> ...

When unsubscribers send an e-mail, don't they get some reply telling
them they have to subscribe?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 11:11:48PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > I never saw them. Strange.
> >
> > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping
> > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that
> > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come
> > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end...
>
> Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the
> reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as
> has been configured for *ages* now ...

Perhaps you should either have a bounce message or modify the
bug submission form to mention this.

> Adam, did you get any message back, though, on those patches? It *should*
> send you something back to say it wasn't posted ... if not, then that
> would be Majordomo2 not doing it ...

They weren't patches, and no, I didn't get anything back. I assumed
that anyone can submit a but.

--
Adam Haberlach |"You have to understand that the
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com | entire 'Net is based on people with
http://www.newsnipple.com/ | too much free time on their hands."

nope ... with this last rash of problems, I'm sitting and reading th rough
each and every admin message and sending a message out to the user letting
them know ...

the concept appears to be that the last thing you want to do is let a
spammer know that his message didn't go through .. :(

On Mon, 22 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > I never saw them. Strange.
> > >
> > > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping
> > > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that
> > > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come
> > > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end...
> >
> > Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the
> > reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as
> > has been configured for *ages* now ...
> >
> > Ed Loehr(sp?) just reported a similar problem with pgsql-general, and from
> > everything I can tell from looking at the pre-Majordomo2 lists, he was
> > never subscribed there or now ... this time, its not Majordomo2's fault
> > ...
>
> When unsubscribers send an e-mail, don't they get some reply telling
> them they have to subscribe?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org