Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Search for version-numbered tclsh? |
Date: | 2008-07-27 00:28:47 |
Message-ID: | 5729.1217118527@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I notice that the recent patch to enforce finding a tclsh broke a couple
of buildfarm machines. On reflection, I remember that recent Tcl
versions don't automatically create a 'tclsh' symlink, only a
version-numbered program such as 'tclsh8.3'. I suggest that maybe we
ought to allow that without forcing people to set TCLSH manually.
Perhaps have PGAC_PATH_TCLSH do
AC_PATH_PROGS(TCLSH, [tclsh tcl tclsh8.5 tclsh8.4 tclsh8.3])
or some such.
regards, tom lane
From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Search for version-numbered tclsh? |
Date: | 2008-07-27 03:03:51 |
Message-ID: | 488BE597.5000802@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | Postg와이즈 토토SQL |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I notice that the recent patch to enforce finding a tclsh broke a couple
> of buildfarm machines. On reflection, I remember that recent Tcl
> versions don't automatically create a 'tclsh' symlink, only a
> version-numbered program such as 'tclsh8.3'. I suggest that maybe we
> ought to allow that without forcing people to set TCLSH manually.
> Perhaps have PGAC_PATH_TCLSH do
>
> AC_PATH_PROGS(TCLSH, [tclsh tcl tclsh8.5 tclsh8.4 tclsh8.3])
>
> or some such.
>
>
>
Bleah. I guess we'll have to.
cheers
andrew