Re: Win32 testing needed

Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 testing needed
Date: 2004-08-06 06:52:12
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F538@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32


> But Mark's failure was in building the backend.

Ah, um, right (sorry, divided attention atm).

FWIW, backing out the most recent changes to src/backend/Makefile, as
suggested, doesn't fix the problem.

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>


From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 testing needed
Date: 2004-08-06 07:48:06
Message-ID: 411337B6.1080001@coretech.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

I can confirm that too (fresh checkout made no difference either)...

Claudio Natoli wrote:

>>But Mark's failure was in building the backend.
>>
>>
>
>Ah, um, right (sorry, divided attention atm).
>
>FWIW, backing out the most recent changes to src/backend/Makefile, as
>suggested, doesn't fix the problem.
>
>---
>Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
>For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
><a
>href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
>ailpolicy.html</a>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>