Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Ming Li <mli(at)apache(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Fixed pg_class refcache leak when the meta tuple in pg_class in invalid. |
Date: | 2016-11-25 09:36:56 |
Message-ID: | CA+F1uf=aAMqBaZvzXcP=wLehsfoY5Wn5Wi=-eYeiUcBHQy9H8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
In some cases the meta tuple in pg_class for a specific relation is
invalid, which will cause relcache leak, and then report warning:
WARNING: relcache reference leak: relation "pg_class" not closed.
The diff file in the attachment can fix this problem.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_class_relcache_leak.diff | text/plain | 527 bytes |
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ming Li <mli(at)apache(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fixed pg_class refcache leak when the meta tuple in pg_class in invalid. |
Date: | 2016-11-25 23:57:58 |
Message-ID: | 1066.1480118278@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ming Li <mli(at)apache(dot)org> writes:
> In some cases the meta tuple in pg_class for a specific relation is
> invalid, which will cause relcache leak, and then report warning:
> WARNING: relcache reference leak: relation "pg_class" not closed.
> The diff file in the attachment can fix this problem.
I'm confused. RelationBuildDesc doesn't open pg_class and shouldn't
be responsible for closing it either; both of those things happen in
ScanPgRelation, leaving no apparent scope for a leak such as you suggest.
Moreover, there's no variable named pg_class_relation in this whole file,
so your patch wouldn't even compile.
Could you show us a test case that provokes the warning you see?
regards, tom lane
From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ming Li <mli(at)apache(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fixed pg_class refcache leak when the meta tuple in pg_class in invalid. |
Date: | 2016-11-28 02:47:36 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQQXB0o4-HxxFMR9ArsuG5MWviStDc1fWZ-TTLWKcjw7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Could you show us a test case that provokes the warning you see?
Nothing to worry about IMO. Looking at the patch, there is no
pg_class_relation declared, so this would not even compile...
--
Michael