Re: Git link for Archive policy

Lists: pgsql-www
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Git link for Archive policy
Date: 2023-04-26 12:37:08
Message-ID: 3CD5E4A2-B8EF-43ED-9142-DEECA19C1195@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-www

Is there a reason we don't have a Gitlink on the Archive policy? Something
like the attached seems reasonable given how other policies have links to
change history.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Attachment Content-Type Size
archivepolicy_gitlink.diff application/octet-stream 574 bytes

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git link for Archive policy
Date: 2023-04-26 12:43:23
Message-ID: CABUevExRx3C0n8QgdC7vcuXcXkuEb7Nw3ewAHxxu-cBewhROmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 2:37 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> Is there a reason we don't have a Gitlink on the Archive policy? Something
> like the attached seems reasonable given how other policies have links to
> change history.

Pretty sure that's an oversight. Can't see, or recall, any other reason.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/


From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git link for Archive policy
Date: 2023-04-26 12:44:54
Message-ID: 0A9E55CE-04FA-46F4-815D-E7C6266F69AE@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-www

> On 26 Apr 2023, at 14:43, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 2:37 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason we don't have a Gitlink on the Archive policy? Something
>> like the attached seems reasonable given how other policies have links to
>> change history.
>
> Pretty sure that's an oversight. Can't see, or recall, any other reason.

That's what I suspected, I will go ahead and make the change barring any
objections.

--
Daniel Gustafsson