Lists: | pgsql-docs |
---|
From: | gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | fix for typos in "Reliability and the Write-ahead Log" |
Date: | 2012-07-03 23:51:37 |
Message-ID: | CAHRs-_ftcxRrRGekw2rzprbEfO0THZNJTRD=1-HykfbvjD86DQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
patch attached.
gabrielle
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix_wal_typos.patch | application/octet-stream | 1022 bytes |
From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fix for typos in "Reliability and the Write-ahead Log" |
Date: | 2012-07-04 07:12:33 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzs-LbjPorHnHVPA-D3Zy+Q0QtRh3m3ErUg3cZY8+Ei2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:51 AM, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> patch attached.
What version did you generate that off? It didn't apply cleanly..
Also, I think the change low->row is actually wrong. It applies to all
low level modifications *including* row level modifications. But there
can be other types of records.
I manually rebased it since it was so small, and applied, though. Thanks!
I did note, which I haven't noted before, that that page talks about
the default wal_buffers being 8. That's clearly just wrong, and
somethign that wasn't properly updated when we added autotuning of
wal_buffers, isn't it?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/