| Lists: | pgsql-in-general |
|---|
| From: | Chris Campbell <ccampbell(at)cascadeds(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-in-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-in-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | PostgreSQL Installation on a Windows 10 Workstation |
| Date: | 2017-11-01 19:43:12 |
| Message-ID: | MWHPR11MB20329F35775EE982A796EA74AB5F0@MWHPR11MB2032.namprd11.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-in-general |
Hello Group.
Stupid question but at least I can say I asked the professionals.
I have a client that has installed PostgreSQL 9.5.x (and the data cluster) on a Windows 10 workstation. Two other workstations access the host workstation via a peer to peer network (port 5432). Curiously, when the user at the host workstation "locks" their PC (goes to lunch, whatever), the other users lose their connections to PostgreSQL.
I realize that this is really more of a "Windows" question than a PostgreSQL question, but I'm wondering if anyone else has had a similar experience/environment and if they've been able to get around the connection loss by allowing the port to remain open and active.
Thanks.
Chris Campbell | Software Engineer
C A S C A D E D A T A S O L U T I O N S
(800) 280-2090
www.cascadeds.com<http://www.cascadeds.com/>