| From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Date: | 2016-01-11 13:57:17 |
| Message-ID: | n70cbtaon70cbt$5ao$1@ger.gmane.org@ger.gmane.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Vladimir Sitnikov schrieb am 11.01.2016 um 14:05:
> The difference is as follows: 1202 can cache across statement.close()
> calls. 1201 can't do that.
>
> In other words, to use server-prepared statements in previous
> versions, you had to reuse the *same* PreparedStatement *object* again
> and again. As soon as you issue .close() you lose your shiny
> server-prepared statement.
>
Ah, thanks.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edson Richter | 2016-01-11 13:59:07 | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-01-11 13:56:57 | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edson Richter | 2016-01-11 13:59:07 | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-01-11 13:56:57 | Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |