Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer

From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's a date + integer operator, but no integer + date operator.
> >> Yawn...
>
> > Uh, "Yawn" means we don't need to fix it, or "oh, here's another one"?
>
> It means "I can't get excited about it." The docs don't claim that we
> have such an operator (do they?) and I see no clear advantage to adding
> one.

Well, I think that have the operator integer + date is not necessary but is
better to have just to forget that not exist each time that someone wrote an
expression involving integer and date.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola