| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer |
| Date: | 2003-08-17 04:57:01 |
| Message-ID: | 9003.1061096221@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's a date + integer operator, but no integer + date operator.
>> Yawn...
> Uh, "Yawn" means we don't need to fix it, or "oh, here's another one"?
It means "I can't get excited about it." The docs don't claim that we
have such an operator (do they?) and I see no clear advantage to adding
one.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-17 05:09:13 | Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-17 04:53:58 | Re: small bug in op + between datetime and integer |