| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 testing needed |
| Date: | 2004-08-06 10:56:44 |
| Message-ID: | 411363EC.3010909@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
>>So it's better if src/port sources don't use backend's functions.
>
>
> Agree. Or rather, better if src/port doesn't use backend DATA.
Not easy to avoid, many functions are really macros using backend data.
I wonder why rmtree uses xmalloc at all; instead of creating an array of
dir names and then iterating the array this could be done in one step.
There may be more than one DIR* open, right?
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-08-06 13:09:13 | Re: Win32 testing needed |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-08-06 10:14:44 | Re: Win32 testing needed |