| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-05 18:21:44 |
| Message-ID: | 4FF5DB38.2010901@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I'd rather have the few overloaded-functions in one file (hopefully
> with deterministic ordering) and a sane, simple filename, than have
> every function in every database in a separate file with some strange
> mess in the filename that makes me cringe every time I see it.
Having tried it both ways, for an existing production project, I agree
with Adrian. One file, multiple functions.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-05 18:29:54 | Re: [PATCH] pg_dump: Sort overloaded functions in deterministic order |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-05 18:12:23 | Re: waitpid in pg_basebackup |